PUBLICATION | Sexton 2014. Cumulative Health Risk Assessment

Cumulative Health Risk Assessment: finding new ideas and escaping from the old ones.

Sexton 2014. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, epub

In this article, Sexton contrasts effect-based and stressor-based cumulative risk assessment (CRA) approaches, and discusses an alternative  vulnerability-based approach (Sexton, 2014). Stressor-based approaches are prospective and useful for chemical regulation, level setting etc, whilst effect-based approaches may come into their own when attempting to explain an observed health effect (retrospectively) and when non-chemical stressors are involved.

The vulnerability-based approach is a hybrid approach with the aim of identifying and evaluating vulnerable or ‘at-risk’ communities/populations. In a phased approach, vulnerability-based CRA would identify vulnerable populations, describe important stressors and identify common receptors and endpoints (phase 1); identify stressors for inclusion in analysis (phase 2); evaluate whether one or several stressors are important (phase 3); quantify a combined effect (phase 4) and consider the possibility of interactions between stressors and effects (phase 5).

This article usefully summarises the purposes and features of CRA approaches, with a slightly US-centric perspective. The difficulties and challenges of CRA are discussed, including data sufficiency, resources, expertise and experience.

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s